fix(qwp): recover an SF slot whose segment tail is an unbacked mapped page#64
Conversation
MmapSegment.openExisting maps a recovered .sfa to its stat length and
scanFrames/detectTornTail read the mapping directly. When a prior
session left a sparse segment tail -- a truncate-based pre-allocation
that never materialized the tail blocks, as happens on ZFS -- a read of
an unbacked page raises the JVM's recoverable InternalError ("a fault
occurred in an unsafe memory access operation"), a translated SIGBUS.
That InternalError is not a MmapSegmentException, so SegmentRing.open
Existing's per-file skip did not catch it: it propagated to the outer
catch, aborted recovery of the whole slot, and surfaced (via a drainer
or a slot-lock probe) as a spurious "unsafe memory access" failure on
ZFS CI runners.
scanFrames and detectTornTail now catch the mmap access fault and treat
the unreadable region exactly like unwritten space or a torn tail: the
boundary of recoverable data. Every frame verified below the fault is
kept; the slot recovers instead of failing. isMmapAccessFault matches
the JVM's stable message so a genuine VirtualMachineError (real OOM,
StackOverflow) is never swallowed.
MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest reproduces the fault deterministically on
any filesystem: it maps a valid one-frame segment, then truncates the
backing under the still-larger mapping so the tail page is beyond EOF
(the one case POSIX mmap always faults on), and asserts the scan stops
at that page and keeps the frame below it. The test errors with the
exact InternalError before the fix and passes after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Recovery reads a mapped .sfa directly; an unbacked page (a ZFS sparse pre-allocation tail, or a torn write leaving a real payloadLen pointing into an unwritten hole) faults on read. Two gaps on the shipping JDK 8: - The mmap-fault guard matched "a fault occurred in an unsafe memory access", which is only the JDK 21+ wording. Pre-21 (incl. JDK 8) emits "...a recent unsafe memory access operation in compiled Java code", so the guard was inert there. Match the shared fragment "unsafe memory access operation". - The payload CRC used the native Crc32c over the mapping. A SIGBUS inside JNI is not translated into a catchable InternalError (that happens only at Unsafe intrinsic sites), so a payload reaching an unbacked page aborted the whole JVM before the CRC check could reject the frame. Fold the recovery-time CRC over Unsafe reads (table-based CRC-32C, bit-identical to native), so the fault is catchable or degrades to a CRC mismatch. Native Crc32c stays on the append hot path. (A pre-touch guard before the native read was tried and proven unreliable: once an earlier native CRC ran in the same scan, it does not reliably fault first.) Rewrite the tests to drive the production openExisting path rather than reflecting into scanFrames: on pre-21 the imprecise fault escapes a reflective invoke frame, so reflection-based tests spuriously failed on JDK 8/11/17 even though the direct-call production path catches it. Induce the unbacked tail portably (truncate down then back up to leave a sparse hole) and size off Files.PAGE_SIZE. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ARN framing M1: openExisting reads magic/version/baseSeq before scanFrames with no guard, so an unbacked page 0 (unflushed header on a truncate-based-allocate FS after a crash, or a file truncated under the mapping) faults with an InternalError that SegmentRing's per-file catch (MmapSegmentException) does not catch -- it escapes to the outer catch (Throwable) and aborts recovery of every sibling segment. Convert an isMmapAccessFault into a MmapSegmentException in openExisting's catch so only that one .sfa is skipped. Adds a portable regression test. M2: the scanFrames in-mapping-fault WARN framed the outcome as "Expected when a prior session left a sparse segment tail", downplaying a possible mid-file media error. Reword it to state frames beyond the fault are discarded and that a bad sector is indistinguishable here, and document that tornTailBytes() reports 0 for an unbacked bail-out region by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…the FSN-gap error Follow-up on the PR #64 review minors. m3: MmapSegmentTest and MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest carried verbatim copies of the native tmp-dir setUp/tearDown (~28 lines each). Hoist them into TestUtils.createTmpDir / removeTmpDir so both classes and any future SF cursor test share one implementation. m5: the FSN-gap MmapSegmentException fired on a sealed segment that under-recovered (a sparse/unbacked or media-truncated tail), but its message and comment blamed only "partial-write/manual-deletion". Name the truncated-tail cause and ask operators to check disk health, matching the diagnostics-honesty wording already added to the scanFrames WARN. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Code review — level 3 (full pass, per-finding source verification)Re-review of the current state of the branch (three commits past the initial version), verifying the follow-up fixes independently — including deriving the hand-rolled CRC by hand and running experiments on JDK 17/21/25. Scope: 5 files, no binaries (committed-binary gate passes). Verdict: Approve with minor follow-ups. No Critical or correctness findings.The production code is correct. The remaining issues are in the test safety-net and CI/verification matrix, not the shipping code — but one I proved empirically and it matters for a mission-critical, hard-to-reproduce fix. ModerateM1 — The three new regression tests provide zero fail-on-revert protection on ext4/xfs (in-diff, empirically proven)I reverted both production files to the pre-branch base, kept the new test, and ran it on an ext4 host: Since the bug is ZFS-specific and the main CI runners are ext4/xfs (green there; only flaked on Suggested fix (pick one):
This is the difference between the fix being permanently guarded and being one refactor away from silently regressing on the exact ZFS path it targets. M2 — Fix mechanism unverified on JDK 8 (the shipping/CI source-of-truth) (verification gate, low residual risk)The fix depends on HotSpot delivering a catchable
JDK 17 shares JDK 8's exact pre-21 wording and the async-delivery quirk, and catches the fault in both interpreter and JIT — so residual risk is low. But JDK 8 is the shipping/CI target and the original flake was on a JDK-8 ZFS runner, so the new test must be run on JDK 8 (ideally the ZFS runner) before merge. I could not run JDK 8 locally (only 17/21/25). (The imprecise pre-21 delivery only escapes a reflective Minorm1 — PR description is stale and its test-plan claim is misleadingThe body's Fix section describes only the original m2 — Cosmetic
Verified correct — do not re-chase
Summary
🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
The three MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest cases only fault on ZFS: on ext4/xfs a within-EOF sparse hole zero-fills, so the scan stops via the CRC-mismatch / bad-magic branch and every test stays green even with the recovery mmap-fault guard fully reverted -- zero fail-on-revert protection on the primary CI runners (PR #64 review, item M1). Proven by reverting both production files to the pre-branch base: 3/3 still passed on ext4. Add a portable seam and two tests that fault deterministically on any filesystem. A read of a mapped page beyond the file's real EOF raises SIGBUS everywhere (POSIX), which HotSpot translates to a catchable InternalError at an Unsafe intrinsic site -- the same fault an unbacked ZFS page raises. openExisting gains a FilesFacade overload (mirroring create) whose file length flows through the facade; a test facade reports a length larger than the real (truncated-down) file so the mapping extends past EOF. - FilesFacade.length(String) + DefaultFilesFacade delegate; openExisting(String) now delegates to openExisting(FilesFacade, String), which also routes openRW and close through the facade. - testScanFaultOnMapPastEofIsHandledAnyFilesystem and testHeaderFaultOnMapPastEofIsSkippableAnyFilesystem fault on ext4 and fail on revert (verified: raw InternalError escapes when the guard is neutralized, while the three sparse-hole tests stay green -- exactly the M1 gap). The scan test accepts both handled outcomes: under the interpreter/C1 the fault is caught in scanFrames (graceful partial recovery), but once C2 inlines scanFrames into openExisting the async unsafe-access InternalError is delivered to openExisting's outer catch instead, converting the file to a skippable MmapSegmentException. Both are safe (no JVM abort, no raw error into recovery); a revert lets a raw InternalError through and fails the test either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nism (#64 M2) The recovery fix rests on HotSpot delivering a catchable InternalError (message containing "unsafe memory access operation") at an Unsafe access and on a direct try/catch catching it. Prior review verified this on JDK 17/21/25 and inferred JDK 8 from the adjacent pre-21 LTS releases, but JDK 8 is the shipping/CI source of truth and the original flake was on a JDK-8 ZFS runner, so it had to be checked there directly. Verified on Temurin 1.8.0_492: MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest passes 5/5 in both -Xint and JIT modes; HotSpot emits "a fault occurred in a recent unsafe memory access operation in compiled Java code"; a direct try/catch catches the fault in interpreter, C1, and C2 modes; isMmapAccessFault's shared fragment matches while the JDK 21+-only needle it replaced does not. The build-jdk8 CI job already runs this test on JDK 8 on every push, so the gate stays enforced. Documents the result in the test's class javadoc; no behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Address the two cosmetic follow-ups from the #64 review: - buildCrc32cTable now uses a /** */ javadoc, matching its sibling private helpers crc32cRecovery/detectTornTail (was a // comment). - The payload-unbacked test asserted the frame-2 header "must end on the page boundary"; it actually ends 8 bytes below it (the asserted boundary-8 value, per the javadoc above). Reword to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bluestreak01
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of PR #64 — fix(qwp): recover an SF slot whose segment tail is an unbacked mapped page
Reviewed at level 3 (full mission-critical pass: all reviewer lenses, per-finding source verification, empirical revert experiment on this host).
Scope: 7 files, +771/−47. No binaries — committed-binary gate passes (git diff --numstat shows no -/- binary rows). Production: MmapSegment.java (+182/−20), SegmentRing.java (+10/−3, message/comment only), FilesFacade.java (+16, one new method), DefaultFilesFacade.java (+5). Tests: new MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest.java (+508), MmapSegmentTest.java (dedup), TestUtils.java (+43, shared helpers).
What I verified independently (not taken on faith)
- CRC bit-identity, mechanically. Extracted the native
crc32c_table[256]fromcore/src/main/c/share/crc32c.cand re-ranbuildCrc32cTable()'s recurrence in Python: tables identical, all 256 entries (entry[1]=0xf26b8303both). Seed/complement (~INIT…~crc) and the byte-at-a-time loop match the native tail loop. The tests also cross-validate at runtime (frames written with nativeCrc32care accepted by the Unsafecrc32cRecovery), so a single-bit divergence would reject them. - Portable fail-on-revert, empirically. I reverted the guard (restored native
Crc32cinscanFrames, removed the threeInternalErrorcatches) keeping only theFilesFacadeseam, on this xfs/tmpfs + JDK 25 host. The twoMapPastEoftests failed withjava.lang.InternalError: a fault occurred in an unsafe memory access operation; the three sparse-hole tests stayed green (tmpfs zero-fills within-EOF holes). This proves the map-past-EOF tests are genuine portable regression guards, then restored the file (tree clean). - All tests pass unreverted: 110 tests across the full
sf.cursor+Crc32cTest+RecoveryReplayTestsuite, includingMmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest(5),MmapSegmentTest(13),SegmentRingRecoveryUnlinkTest(2). Fulltest-compileclean.
Critical
None.
Moderate
None. The two open items from the prior maintainer review are both resolved in the current branch, and I confirmed each:
- Prior M1 (no fail-on-revert off ZFS): resolved by the new
FilesFacade.length(String)map-past-EOF seam + the twoMapPastEof*tests — proven above to fail-on-revert on non-ZFS. - Prior M2 (fix unverified on JDK 8): CI's
build-jdk8job runs the entire test suite on JDK 8 (mvn … clean install), soMmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest— including the portable guards — runs on the shipping floor on every PR. GitHububuntu-latestis ext4, where the portable tests are the live regression guard.
Minor
- m1 — Test facade boilerplate duplicated.
MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTest.MapPastEofFacade(test lines 369–508) re-implements all 26FilesFacademethods delegating toINSTANCE, the same delegate-everything shape already inMmapSegmentTest.FaultyFilesFacade. A sharedDelegatingFilesFacadetest adapter (override-only-what-you-inject) would DRY both. Optional — the new facade matches the pre-existing in-repo pattern and no shared adapter exists yet. - m2 — Informational, not blocking (documented tradeoff, unreachable in production). Under C2 the inlined async unsafe-access fault is delivered to
openExisting's outercatch (Throwable)→MmapSegmentException→SegmentRingskips the whole.sfa, dropping the recoverable frames below the fault, whereas interpreter/C1 partially recovers them. Production recovery is one-shot at startup on cold code (never near the ~10k-invocation C2 threshold), and the dropped frames are the highest-FSN un-acked tail, so the store-and-forward durability guarantee holds in practice. Worth keeping in mind only if recovery were ever made hot/repeated. The author already documents and tests both outcomes. - m3 — No
Fixes #NN. The body references #65 as a related (distinct-root-cause) bug but cites no filed issue for the ZFS flake. Optional if none exists.
Downgraded (false positives — verified against source)
- "
detectTornTailreturning 0 on fault could makeSegmentRingunlink a segment holding real data." — False. Page-granularity: if the header (page 0, offset 0) read succeeded, frame[0]'s header (offset 24–31, also page 0) is backed, so the[lastGood, lastGood+8)probe atlastGood==HEADER_SIZEcannot fault — it reads real bytes (→tornTailBytes>0→ quarantine to.corrupt, not unlink) or zeros (→ genuinely empty hot-spare → correct unlink). The fault-catch only fires atlastGood>HEADER_SIZE, whereframeCount>0, so the unlink branch is never taken. Unreachable. - "The
InternalErrormessage-match could swallow a wild-pointer logic bug as end-of-data." — False. EveryUnsaferead inscanFrames/crc32cRecovery/detectTornTail/header stays within[addr, addr+fileSize)(loop guard + thepos+8+payloadLen>fileSizecheck), so a fault is always a genuinely unbacked page inside the mapping, never a stray pointer. - "Adding
length(String)toFilesFacadebreaks other implementors." — False. Exactly three implementors (DefaultFilesFacade, testFaultyFilesFacade, testMapPastEofFacade), all updated; fulltest-compileclean. - "
crc32cRecoverymay diverge from nativeCrc32c(sign extension / len=0)." — False. Table bit-identical; low-byte XOR is sign-agnostic under&0xFF; only ever called withlen≥4; runtime cross-validation passes on payloads containing high-bit bytes. - "
SegmentRingFSN-gap message change breaksSegmentRingTest." — False. New message still begins"FSN gap in recovered segments:";SegmentRingTest:353asserts.contains("FSN gap")— still matches, test green.
Coverage map
| # | Behavioral change | Test (local) | Failure link | Dimensions | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | openExisting header-read mmap fault → MmapSegmentException (was: raw InternalError aborts slot) |
testHeaderFaultOnMapPastEofIsSkippableAnyFilesystem (portable) + testUnbackedHeaderPageIsSkippableNotFatal |
On revert, raw InternalError escapes openExisting → test errors (proven empirically) |
error ✓, cleanup ✓ (assertMemoryLeak), boundary ✓; concurrency N-A (single-threaded recovery) | TESTED |
| 2 | scanFrames in-mapping fault → data boundary, keep frames below (was: abort) |
testScanFaultOnMapPastEofIsHandledAnyFilesystem (portable) + testRecoveryKeepsFramesBeforeUnbackedTail / …PayloadReachingUnbackedPage (ZFS) |
On revert, InternalError escapes/JVM abort (proven) |
happy ✓, error ✓, boundary ✓, cleanup ✓ | TESTED |
| 3 | Recovery CRC via crc32cRecovery (Unsafe) instead of native Crc32c — bit-identical |
Every writeSegment-based case (native-write / Unsafe-verify) + 13 MmapSegmentTest recoveries |
A 1-bit table/sign error rejects a valid frame → frameCount assertion fails |
happy ✓, NULL N-A, boundary (0-len, page-edge) ✓ | TESTED |
| 4 | detectTornTail in-mapping fault → return 0 (clean) (was: abort) |
testRecoveryKeepsFramesBeforeUnbackedTail (asserts tornTailBytes==0) + testScanFaultOnMapPastEofIsHandled… |
On revert, fault escapes probe loop → test errors | error ✓, boundary ✓ | TESTED |
| 5 | FilesFacade.length(String) / DefaultFilesFacade.length(String) — new delegating method |
Exercised by every openExisting(String) recovery test |
Wrong length → mapping wrong size → recovery assertion fails | happy ✓ | TESTED |
| 6 | SegmentRing.openExisting FSN-gap message text appended; comment reworded |
SegmentRingTest (.contains("FSN gap")) still green |
— | — | EXEMPT (verified: message-text only, no control-flow delta) |
| 7 | TestUtils.createTmpDir/removeTmpDir extracted; MmapSegmentTest dedup |
All tests using them (110 green) | — | — | EXEMPT (test-infra, verbatim extraction) |
Summary
- Verdict: Approve. The production change is correct, minimal, and well-guarded; the two prior-review Moderates are resolved and I re-verified both.
- Test & tandem gate: PASS. This is a fix PR with regression tests whose failure links I proved empirically (portable fail-on-revert). It is unit-testable-only — the fault is a pure filesystem/JVM interaction reproduced in-process; the originally-flaking
BackgroundDrainerPoolInterruptedCloseTestis itself a unit test in this repo. No OSS/Enterprise/e2e-python tandem required (no drainer send-loop, reconnect budget, pool-startup, replication, orkill -9dependence is touched;gh pr list --head fix/recovery-mmap-unbacked-pagefinds none, as expected). The store-and-forward drainer invariants checklist is N-A here. - Zero-GC gate: PASS. The producer hot path (
tryAppend) is untouched and still uses nativeCrc32c. New allocations (CRC32C_TABLE, the recovery CRC loop,isMmapAccessFault'sString.contains) are class-init / cold-recovery only — no per-row / per-producer-call allocation. - Coverage map: 7 behavioral changes — 5 TESTED (2 with portable fail-on-revert proven on this host), 2 EXEMPT (verified no-behavioral-change). 0 UNTESTED.
- Required-tandem status: none required (unit-testable-only).
- Findings: 5 draft findings dropped as false positives after source verification, 3 Minor retained. In-diff vs out-of-diff: all retained findings in-diff; the sole out-of-diff callsite (
SegmentRing.openExisting's per-file skip / unlink /.corruptquarantine) was walked and verified SAFE under the new fault-derivedMmapSegmentExceptionandtornTailBytes==0behavior.
[PR Coverage check]😍 pass : 44 / 46 (95.65%) file detail
|
Problem
MmapSegment.openExistingmaps a recovered.sfafile to its stat length and scans it in place: the header block (magic/version/baseSeq),scanFrames, anddetectTornTailall read the mapping viaUnsafe. When a prior session left a sparse segment tail — a truncate-based pre-allocation that never materialized the tail blocks, which is what happens on filesystems like ZFS — reading an unbacked page raises the JVM's recoverableInternalErrorwhose message contains"unsafe memory access operation"(a translated SIGBUS).That
InternalErroris not aMmapSegmentException, soSegmentRing.openExisting's per-file skip did not catch it. It propagated to the outer catch and aborted recovery of the whole slot. In practice this surfaced through aBackgroundDrainer(or a slot-lock probe) as a spurious "unsafe memory access" failure — observed as an intermittent failure ofBackgroundDrainerPoolInterruptedCloseTeston the ZFS CI runner (linux-x64-zfs), and green on ext4/xfs runners because those zero-fill mmap reads of unwritten regions instead of faulting.Fix
Recovery now treats an unbacked/unreadable mapped page as the boundary of recoverable data — keeping every frame verified below it and returning a usable segment — instead of letting the fault abort the slot. Four parts:
scanFramesanddetectTornTailcatch the mmap access fault and stop at that offset, exactly as they already treat unwritten space or a torn tail. Frames below the fault are kept; this mirrors the existing torn-tail semantics (a region past the last valid frame is a boundary, not a fatal error).Unsafeon the recovery path. The recovery-time frame CRC is now computed bycrc32cRecovery, a table-driven CRC-32C read throughUnsafe(bit-identical to the nativeCrc32c, verified). A torn write can leave a realpayloadLenwhose payload spans a backed→unbacked page edge; the native JNICrc32creading across that edge raises a SIGBUS HotSpot cannot translate, aborting the whole JVM. Folding the CRC throughUnsafemakes that fault a catchableInternalErrorinstead. NativeCrc32cstays on the append hot path (recovery is a cold scan).openExistingheader-read guard. The header reads run beforescanFrames, so an unbacked page 0 faults ahead of the scan guard.openExisting's catch now converts an mmap fault into aMmapSegmentException, soSegmentRingskips just that.sfarather than aborting recovery of every sibling segment.isMmapAccessFaultmatches the fragment"unsafe memory access operation", present in both the pre-21 wording ("a fault occurred in a recent unsafe memory access operation in compiled Java code", JDK 8/11/17) and the 21+ wording ("a fault occurred in an unsafe memory access operation"). This makes the guard live on JDK 8 — the shipping/CI Java floor and the exact JDK the original flake was reported on. (The previous needle matched only 21+.)A genuine
VirtualMachineError(real OOM,StackOverflowError) is never swallowed — only the documented, recoverable mmap-access fault is (the match is message-gated onInternalError).Tradeoffs and scope
InternalError). The matched fragment is shared across every current JDK (8→25); if a future JDK reworded it again the guard would stop matching and the pre-fix behavior (abort recovery) would return — no silent data corruption, just the old failure mode.tornTailBytes(); thescanFramesWARN names both the benign sparse-tail cause and the indistinguishable mid-file media-error (bad-sector) cause, and asks operators to check disk health.createstill pre-allocates viaFilesFacade.allocate; where the nativeposix_fallocate/F_PREALLOCATEis unavailable and it falls back toftruncate, the sparse tail can still occur — this change makes recovery survive it rather than eliminating it.How this relates to #65
#65 fixes a different bug with the same signature. Both issues surface as an intermittent
java.lang.InternalError: a fault occurred in an unsafe memory access operationout of drainer/teardown tests, which is why they were initially easy to conflate — but the root causes are independent. Here the fault is read-side and environmental: a sparse segment tail left by a truncate-based pre-allocation faults when recovery maps and scans the file on a hole-faulting filesystem (ZFS); no other thread is involved, the file is simply not fully backed. In #65 the fault is a shutdown lifecycle race:SegmentManager.close()called on an already-interrupted thread abandoned its live worker, and the leaked worker kept truncating/unlinking segment files underneath a laterCursorSendEnginemapping — a fault that can hit on any filesystem, sparse tail or not.The fixes are complementary and neither subsumes the other. #65 removes one producer of the fault (a leaked worker mutating files it no longer owns) but does nothing for sparse tails, which would still fault recovery on ZFS without this PR. Conversely, this PR hardens only the recovery consumer (
MmapSegment.openExistingtreats a faulting page as a data boundary); the send-path mapping #65's race hit is outside its scope — and rightly so, since the correct fix there is to eliminate the race, not to catch the fault. For future triage of anunsafe memory accessreport: a fault during recovery on a hole-faulting FS points here; a fault during send/teardown with an interrupt in play points at #65.Test plan
New
MmapSegmentRecoveryFaultTestdrives the production entry point (openExisting), not the private scan methods via reflection — reflection changes fault delivery on pre-21 JDKs and would spuriously fail on the shipping JDK. It covers the unbacked tail via two complementary mechanisms:punchSparseTail: truncate the file down, then back up to the mapping size, leaving a within-EOF hole): reproduce the ZFS fault directly. On a hole-faulting FS (ZFS) the read faults; on a hole-zero-filling FS (ext4/xfs) the hole reads back as zeroes and the scan stops via the CRC-mismatch / bad-magic branch. These are only fail-on-revert on ZFS — on ext4/xfs they stay green with the guard reverted. Cases: clean unbacked tail kept + boundary correct + no torn tail; header-backed / payload-unbacked frame rejected via the Unsafe CRC fold (the case that would SIGBUS through nativeCrc32c); fully-holed file → header read surfaces a skippableMmapSegmentException.FilesFacadethat reports the original larger length, so the mapping extends past real EOF): a read past real EOF faults on every filesystem, giving a portable fail-on-revert guard that also protects the ext4/xfs CI runners. Cases: a scan fault past EOF is handled (interpreter/C1 → graceful partial recovery; C2 → the inlined async fault escapes toopenExisting's outer catch and becomes a per-file skip, asserted to carry the"unsafe memory access operation"message so a revert still fails); a header fault past EOF is converted to a skippableMmapSegmentException.Correcting the earlier revert-claim in this description: the sparse-hole tests error-before / pass-after only on ZFS (green either way on ext4/xfs); the portable regression protection comes from the map-past-EOF tests.
The fault-delivery mechanism the fix rests on was verified directly on JDK 8 (Temurin 1.8.0_492) — the shipping/CI floor — in both interpreter (
-Xint) and JIT modes, plus on JDK 17/21/25: HotSpot emits the pre-21 message, the shared fragment matches, and a directtry/catchcatches the fault in interpreter, C1, and C2.MmapSegmentTest(13),SegmentRingRecoveryUnlinkTest(2) andBackgroundDrainerPoolInterruptedCloseTest(the ZFS flake) pass locally.TestUtils.createTmpDir/removeTmpDirwere extracted and are now shared (removing ~24 duplicated lines fromMmapSegmentTest).🤖 Generated with Claude Code