Skip to content

Remove insert-only client section in the README#1237

Merged
brandur merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
brandur-remove-insert-only
May 12, 2026
Merged

Remove insert-only client section in the README#1237
brandur merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
brandur-remove-insert-only

Conversation

@brandur

@brandur brandur commented May 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Remove insert-only client section in the README and replace it with a
link to specific docs on the subject. Insert-only clients aren't that
important as a concept, and we streamline the README by getting rid of
this section. Reflects the copy over in [1].

[1] https://github.com/riverqueue/homepage/pull/409

Remove insert-only client section in the README and replace it with a
link to specific docs on the subject. Insert-only clients aren't that
important as a concept, and we streamline the README by getting rid of
this section. Reflects the copy over in [1].

[1] riverqueue/homepage#409
@brandur brandur requested a review from bgentry May 3, 2026 16:29
@brandur brandur merged commit 0da4e6a into master May 12, 2026
15 checks passed
@brandur brandur deleted the brandur-remove-insert-only branch May 12, 2026 17:39
@cryptk

cryptk commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Just a heads up that the link that you replaced that section with gives a 404. Did you mean to link to somewhere in the doc site maybe? Or did you intend to add a file to this PR that got missed or something?

@brandur

brandur commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cryptk Yes, oops, it's meant to go to the website as opposed to being a relative link to the GitHub repo. Opened #1300. Thanks for reporting!

brandur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
This was meant to go to the riverqueue.com website as opposed to be
relative link in GitHub. As pointed out here [1].

[1] #1237 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants