Skip to content

add docs_rs_crates_io subcrate for interaction / shared types - #3357

Open
syphar wants to merge 4 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
syphar:event-structs
Open

add docs_rs_crates_io subcrate for interaction / shared types#3357
syphar wants to merge 4 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
syphar:event-structs

Conversation

@syphar

@syphar syphar commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

first use-case is the SQS link for index changes that will replace our git index usage

@syphar syphar self-assigned this Jun 3, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed label Jun 3, 2026
Comment thread crates/lib/docs_rs_crates_io/src/events.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/lib/docs_rs_crates_io/src/events.rs Outdated
@syphar
syphar requested a review from LawnGnome July 1, 2026 12:49
@syphar
syphar marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2026 14:49
@syphar
syphar requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2026 14:49
Comment thread crates/lib/docs_rs_crates_io/src/events.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/lib/docs_rs_crates_io/Cargo.toml
@GuillaumeGomez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Btw, you created this crate but it's not used anywhere in our codebase for now. Shouldn't we plug it into our codebase in this PR directly?

@syphar

syphar commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Btw, you created this crate but it's not used anywhere in our codebase for now. Shouldn't we plug it into our codebase in this PR directly?

usage is WIP in #3349.

Idea is:

  • we release this crate
  • crates.io adds it, then starts publishing events using these structs
  • then we can start consuming the events.

@syphar
syphar requested a review from GuillaumeGomez July 1, 2026 20:26
@syphar

syphar commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

( waiting for approval from @LawnGnome too before merging / releasing)

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot

rustbot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants