Conversation
|
rustbot has assigned @JonathanBrouwer. Use |
|
How about adding the test mentioned in the issue? fn main() {
let x = vec![1];
let y = [1];
let _ = x == y;
let _ = y == x;
} |
|
r? libs |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📋 This PR cannot be approved because it currently has the following label: |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
|
@bors r- |
|
Actually this needs an FCP. @rfcbot merge |
|
Error encounted: |
|
@rfcbot merge libs-api |
|
@rustbot ready |
implement PartialEq<Vec<U>> for [T; N] and &[T; N]
|
@craterbot check |
|
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
|
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
|
🎉 Experiment
Footnotes
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
r? libs |
|
Next steps: Please rebase this and look at the crater report. @rustbot author |
|
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
381b5eb to
22cc805
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
|
@rustbot ready |
|
My personal preference here would be to replace the PR with one that comments out the relevant lines and explains that they have inference regressions so we know to not try this again, but we could also just close this. And yeah, looking at it, it makes sense, since the majority of the regressions are code calling |
|
Well, we should definitely add a test that triggers this inference failure so that it's checked going forward. Other than that, I'm not convinced this change is worth the breakage. At the very least, accepting this breakage would require that we go through the affected crates and fix them, and we'd also need another FCP to accept the breakage. @rustbot author |
View all comments
Closes #149017
@Centril you're mentioned in the FIXME; do you have thoughts on this?