Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Broad motion-graphics briefs need a consistent visual language and deliberate timing across scenes. The previous guidance left those decisions implicit, while evenly spaced contact sheets could miss a fast handoff or landing.
This change:
Validation: six FFmpeg-backed tests pass (33 assertions); bun run lint, ESLint for both review scripts, and git diff --check pass. Exercised the tool against an existing 1080x1920, 24fps ProRes master and inspected its contact sheet. Skill frontmatter was checked with Bun YAML; the bundled Python validator could not run because PyYAML is absent.
No dependencies, current compositions, assets, saved preferences, or registry entries changed. Creative guidance still needs judging on newly authored work; the technical tests do not establish a visual-quality improvement.