Allow detailed physics profile output to be switched off

[timothy-nunn]

Adds an option to remove detailed physics profiles from the MFile.

process -i my.IN.DAT --no-profiles

I have tested the plotting of a summary document from such an MFile and no errors occur however the figures for the detailed physics profiles contain no data/ a zero line.

I think this is fine since the user explicitly requested no profiles, however I am happy to discuss skipping these plots for a reduced MFile if we think that is worthwhile.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.85714% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 48.84%. Comparing base (8ff9577) to head (f64a035).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
process/main.py	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
process/models/physics/physics.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4416      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.82%   48.84%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         151      151              
  Lines       29409    29413       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        14360    14366       +6     
+ Misses      15049    15047       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[chris-ashe]

@timothy-nunn May as well change the value of n_plasma_profile_elements down to 100 here also

[timothy-nunn]

@timothy-nunn May as well change the value of n_plasma_profile_elements down to 100 here also

I would probably opt to do that in another PR since it will cause massive regression failures

[je-cook]

I dont see the need for this option being exposed on the main process cli, especially as the MFILE is explicitly the machine readable version. I prefer the option of reducing the number of points recorded. This is surely only talking about 121kB (31entries*500points*8bytes) / 1024 to 12kB assuming 7 char per entry?