Skip to content

Compare primitive values with RowFn - #9587

Draft
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/row-fn-canonical-validityfrom
ct/primitive-comparison-simd
Draft

Compare primitive values with RowFn#9587
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/row-fn-canonical-validityfrom
ct/primitive-comparison-simd

Compare primitive values with RowFn

57d3d96
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Aug 29, 2026 in 0s

28 benchmarks regressed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 96 improved benchmarks
❌ 28 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2045 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 106 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 4 archived benchmarks run2

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
WallTime mul_u64_nonnull_neon 15.3 µs 20.9 µs -27.14%
WallTime lt_i64_nullable_avx512 2.9 µs 3.6 µs -20.13%
WallTime eq_i64_constant_avx512 2.1 µs 2.6 µs -19.2%
WallTime lt_i64_nullable_avx2 2.9 µs 3.6 µs -18.06%
Simulation int_gt[16] 97.3 µs 117.3 µs -17.06%
WallTime eq_i64_constant_avx2 2.2 µs 2.7 µs -16%
Simulation int_gt[1024] 102.8 µs 122.1 µs -15.76%
Simulation or_chain[16] 1.1 ms 1.4 ms -15.5%
Simulation or_chain[1024] 1.2 ms 1.4 ms -14.67%
Simulation take[duplicates/repeated/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16/indices=1000] 201.4 µs 235.3 µs -14.42%
Simulation float_gt[16] 239.8 µs 278.2 µs -13.83%
Simulation float_gt[1024] 263.6 µs 305.9 µs -13.82%
WallTime multiply_shapes_neon[(16384, PerRowPerRow)] 17.4 µs 20.1 µs -13.31%
WallTime compare_int_nullable_avx512 3.6 µs 4.2 µs -13.19%
WallTime mul_i64_nonnull_neon 17.4 µs 20 µs -13.18%
WallTime mul_i8_nonnull_avx2 11.3 µs 13 µs -13.17%
Simulation is_not_null_pred[16] 195.4 µs 225 µs -13.14%
Simulation case_when_all_true[1000] 102.3 µs 116.2 µs -11.95%
Simulation case_when_all_false[1000] 100.1 µs 113.6 µs -11.83%
Simulation is_not_null_pred[1024] 207.2 µs 234.7 µs -11.7%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ct/primitive-comparison-simd (57d3d96) with develop (3a1838c)3

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. 4 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

  3. No successful run was found on ct/row-fn-canonical-validity (f17be3d) during the generation of this report, so develop (3a1838c) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.