Skip to content

feat(zarr-metadata): Zarr metadata model layer#4119

Open
d-v-b wants to merge 47 commits into
zarr-developers:mainfrom
d-v-b:zarr-metadata-model-layer
Open

feat(zarr-metadata): Zarr metadata model layer#4119
d-v-b wants to merge 47 commits into
zarr-developers:mainfrom
d-v-b:zarr-metadata-model-layer

Conversation

@d-v-b

@d-v-b d-v-b commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds dataclass representations of array + group metadata, and syntactical validation routines, to zarr-metadata. These classes are designed to augment the basic JSON representation of zarr metadata documents with the user-friendly affordances of a class, without any pretense of runtime behavior like chunk encoding or whatnot.

This PR also contains some pydantic integration functionality gated behind an optional dep. installing the package with pydantic exposes the integration point. the pydantic integration allows re-using the zarr metadata types as pydantic fields, with validation.

For reviewers

These classes are a potential replacement for the metadata classes we currently define in zarr-python. Those classes are tightly coupled to zarr-python internals, which IMO has no served us well. For that reason, the classes in this PR are deliberately isolated from zarr-python internals. You should think about whether the classes added in this PR would be useful for zarr-python rely on (since zarr-python is the main consumer I'm writing for)

Author attestation

  • I am a human, these are my changes, and I have reviewed and understood every change and can explain why each is correct.

AI coding assistance is welcome, but a human must be the author and is responsible for the contents of the PR. The description and any review responses must be in your own words. Please read AI-assisted contributions before opening.

TODO

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/user-guide/*.md
  • Changes documented as a new file in changes/
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

dependabot Bot and others added 30 commits May 31, 2026 19:28
…#176)

Bumps the actions group with 8 updates in the / directory:

| Package | From | To |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [prefix-dev/setup-pixi](https://github.com/prefix-dev/setup-pixi) | `0.9.5` | `0.9.6` |
| [codecov/codecov-action](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action) | `6.0.0` | `6.0.1` |
| [github/issue-metrics](https://github.com/github/issue-metrics) | `4.2.2` | `4.2.7` |
| [j178/prek-action](https://github.com/j178/prek-action) | `2.0.3` | `2.0.4` |
| [actions/upload-artifact](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact) | `7.0.0` | `7.0.1` |
| [actions/download-artifact](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact) | `7.0.0` | `8.0.1` |
| [pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish](https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish) | `1.13.0` | `1.14.0` |
| [zizmorcore/zizmor-action](https://github.com/zizmorcore/zizmor-action) | `0.5.3` | `0.5.6` |



Updates `prefix-dev/setup-pixi` from 0.9.5 to 0.9.6
- [Release notes](https://github.com/prefix-dev/setup-pixi/releases)
- [Commits](prefix-dev/setup-pixi@1b2de7f...5185adf)

Updates `codecov/codecov-action` from 6.0.0 to 6.0.1
- [Release notes](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](codecov/codecov-action@57e3a13...e79a696)

Updates `github/issue-metrics` from 4.2.2 to 4.2.7
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/issue-metrics/releases)
- [Commits](github-community-projects/issue-metrics@c9e9838...1e38d5e)

Updates `j178/prek-action` from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4
- [Release notes](https://github.com/j178/prek-action/releases)
- [Commits](j178/prek-action@6ad8027...bdca6f1)

Updates `actions/upload-artifact` from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases)
- [Commits](actions/upload-artifact@v7...043fb46)

Updates `actions/download-artifact` from 7.0.0 to 8.0.1
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/releases)
- [Commits](actions/download-artifact@v7...3e5f45b)

Updates `pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish` from 1.13.0 to 1.14.0
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/releases)
- [Commits](pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.13.0...cef2210)

Updates `zizmorcore/zizmor-action` from 0.5.3 to 0.5.6
- [Release notes](https://github.com/zizmorcore/zizmor-action/releases)
- [Commits](zizmorcore/zizmor-action@b1d7e1f...5f14fd0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: prefix-dev/setup-pixi
  dependency-version: 0.9.6
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: codecov/codecov-action
  dependency-version: 6.0.1
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: github/issue-metrics
  dependency-version: 4.2.7
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: j178/prek-action
  dependency-version: 2.0.4
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: actions/upload-artifact
  dependency-version: 7.0.1
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: actions/download-artifact
  dependency-version: 8.0.1
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish
  dependency-version: 1.14.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
  dependency-group: actions
- dependency-name: zizmorcore/zizmor-action
  dependency-version: 0.5.6
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: actions
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Findings from an API-ergonomics exercise (a fresh agent consuming
defective metadata documents):

- ValidationProblem gains a machine-readable kind (missing_key /
  invalid_type / invalid_value / invalid_json), ending message
  string-matching in consumers.
- The v2 array validator now enforces what its types declare (dtype,
  order, compressor, filters, dimension_separator), and all four
  document validators check the fixed zarr_format / node_type literals.
- All ingestion failures surface as MetadataValidationError: missing
  store keys and undecodable bytes in from_key_value (previously
  KeyError / JSONDecodeError) and constructor invariants (previously
  bare ValueError).
- ZarrMetadataV3 is renamed NamedConfigModelV3: it models a name +
  configuration pair, and the old name read as a whole-document type.
- Discoverability: the validate_*/is_*/parse_* contract is documented
  on zarr_metadata.model itself; update() documents that it does not
  re-validate; the v2 to_json/to_key_value attributes split is
  documented on both.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…aFieldModelV3

Model fields and consumer signatures should convey the logical meaning
of the type (a metadata-document field), not the form it takes when
JSON-serialized (a named configuration). MetadataFieldModelV3 is today
exactly NamedConfigModelV3; if a future spec revision adds a field form
that cannot normalize to name + configuration, the alias widens to a
union and annotation sites do not move. Mirrors the raw-layer split
between NamedConfigV3 (shape) and MetadataV3 (field union).

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
test_v3_to_json_includes_required_fields hand-enumerated keys with
chained asserts, restating what ARRAY_METADATA_REQUIRED_KEYS_V3 already
defines. Now: one coverage assert driven by the constant (tracks the
TypedDict automatically) and one whole-document equality for the values.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
The subset assert against ARRAY_METADATA_REQUIRED_KEYS_V3 was redundant:
equality with a literal that spells out the full document already covers
every required key. One dict, one assert.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Invalid documents that previously passed validation:

- shape/chunks containing JSON booleans (bool is an int subclass in
  Python but not an integer in a metadata document) or negative values
- dimension_names whose length does not match shape
- attributes and configuration values that are not JSON-serializable —
  now checked recursively like fill_value, so an int-keyed dict cannot
  be silently rewritten by json.dumps on round-trip and a set() cannot
  escape as a TypeError from to_key_value
- consolidated_metadata envelopes: the group validator now deep-validates
  the envelope and its entries via the shared
  validate_consolidated_metadata_v3, which ConsolidatedMetadataModelV3
  .from_json also uses, so is_group_metadata_v3 never vouches for a
  document the model constructor would reject

Three pre-existing test fixtures paired dimension_names=('x',) with the
default scalar shape () and were themselves spec-invalid; they now use a
matching 1-d shape.

Deliberately unchanged, pending a design decision: unknown extension
fields with must_understand: true still pass (which layer owns the
spec's refusal duty), and empty v2 dtype records / empty codec names
still pass (domain territory).

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
The v3 core spec: 'An implementation MUST fail to open Zarr groups or
arrays if any metadata fields are present which (a) the implementation
does not recognize and (b) are not explicitly set to
"must_understand": false' — and fields are implicitly must-understand
unless waived.

The model layer cannot discharge this itself: recognition is
reader-specific (consolidated_metadata is itself an extension field one
reader understands and another does not), and a document carrying a
must-understand extension is still a valid document. So the models
partition by obligation: must_understand_fields is the subset of
extra_fields not explicitly waived, and a compliant reader fails to
open when must_understand_fields.keys() - recognized is non-empty.
The design spec pins that duty on the part-2 resolve layer, matching
what zarr-python's parse_extra_fields enforces today.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Delegate wholesale rather than letting pydantic introspect the dataclass:
InstanceOf (is-instance core schema) + BeforeValidator(from_json) +
PlainSerializer(to_json, return_type=dict). Field-by-field validation is
impossible anyway (the models' annotation-only imports live behind
TYPE_CHECKING, so pydantic raises class-not-fully-defined) and would
diverge from the library's structural validation via coercion if it
weren't. MetadataValidationError subclasses ValueError, so failed parses
surface as pydantic ValidationError with the loc-annotated messages.

pydantic is already in the package's test dependency group.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…y not

Correcting the previous commit's too-strong claim: pydantic CAN
introspect the model dataclass — TypeAdapter(...).rebuild() with the
TYPE_CHECKING-only names supplied as _types_namespace resolves the
schema, and __post_init__ invariants still run. A new test exercises
that path and pins why it is not the recommended integration: it
validates the model shape, not the document (bare-string data_type
rejected — no from_json normalization), and pydantic's lax coercion
silently re-opens holes the library validators close (shape=[True, -5]
coerces to (1, -5); a wrong dimension_names count passes).

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…ic-zarr pattern)

For consumers that want a first-class BaseModel — JSON schema generation
and generics for typed attributes, as in pydantic-zarr's ArraySpec — the
example adds a third pattern: pydantic-native fields as the user-facing
surface, with the library as the engine. A mode='before' validator
canonicalizes every input via from_json(...).to_json(), so structural
validation and normalization run before pydantic parses fields (the
[True, -5] coercion divergence cannot occur), and to_metadata_model /
to_document bridge both ways through the document form. One translation
noted at the bridge: the document spells 'no dimension names' as key
absence, the pydantic side as None.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Spec: 'If specified, must be an array of strings or null objects...
If dimension_names is not specified, all dimensions are unnamed.' The
null object is a permitted element (an unnamed dimension), never the
field value; key absence is the only spelling of 'not specified'. Pins
the validator's existing rejection so it is not later 'fixed' to accept
null-as-absence, and documents that in-memory None maps to key absence
on serialization.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
d-v-b added 14 commits July 5, 2026 18:34
…ydantic

Gamed out three shapes with prototypes before choosing:
- dunders on the core classes (works, verified pydantic 2.0-2.13, but
  puts a framework protocol in the dependency-free layer);
- pydantic-aware SUBCLASSES in a namespace (rejected on empirical
  failures: identity split breaks equality, core instances are rejected
  by subclass-typed fields, and nested construction produces core-class
  children unless every cross-reference is overridden);
- Annotated field types over the CORE classes in an opt-in module
  (chosen): instances are the core classes so interop is free, pydantic
  imports eagerly at the module (loud failure when absent), core stays
  framework-free, and pydantic-protocol risk is quarantined to one
  clearly-labeled module.

The module exports one field type per model. Validation delegates to
from_json (structural validation and normalization cannot be bypassed by
pydantic coercion), instances pass through, serialization emits the
canonical document, and WithJsonSchema describes the accepted document
form so model_json_schema works. Tests cover all seven field types,
core-instance interop, error quality, JSON schema, roundtrip, and that
importing zarr_metadata does not import pydantic.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
create_default(shape=(100, 100)) silently kept the scalar default's 0-d
chunk grid (chunk_shape: ()), producing a structurally-valid but
semantically inconsistent document — a footgun for every test fixture
built on it. When shape is overridden and the grid is not, the default
is now one regular chunk covering the array (v3 chunk_shape == shape,
v2 chunks == shape); an explicit chunk_grid/chunks override still wins.
update() stays a dumb dataclasses.replace, per its documented contract.

One existing whole-document test literal carried exactly this
inconsistency (shape (10,) with chunk_shape ()) and was updated.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…unk grid

The spec's constraint is conditional ('non-zero when the corresponding
dimensions of the arrays have non-zero length'), so chunk_shape == shape
is sound for every shape, including empty dimensions.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…-way

Overriding shape without a grid derives the grid; the reverse does not
hold. A user-supplied chunk_grid is an extension point taken verbatim —
deriving shape from it would require interpreting grid configurations,
which the model layer never does and cannot do for unrecognized grid
names. Pinned by test so the asymmetry reads as a decision, not an
oversight; the v2 model documents the same one-way rule for chunks for
cross-version consistency.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Audited all 24 (15 src, 9 tests); each was either obsolete, replaceable
by a sound cast, or avoidable by better-typed code:

- Two fill_value arg-type ignores were factually obsolete: their
  justifying comment said 'fill_value: object in upstream TypedDict',
  but 0.3.0 narrowed it to JSONValue.
- Eight pre-existing call-arg/reportInvalidTypeForm ignores on the PEP
  728 TypedDicts and the recursive JSONValue alias were mypy-dialect
  suppressions that the checker of record (pyright strict with
  enableExperimentalFeatures) never needed; mypy has never checked this
  package.
- The two extra_fields comprehensions are a genuine checker limitation
  (a key filter cannot narrow a PEP 728 TypedDict's item-value union),
  now expressed as casts whose comments state the soundness claim
  instead of suppressing the diagnostic.
- pydantic.py's generic coercer factory takes the parse callable
  explicitly instead of calling from_json through type[_M].
- NamedConfigModelV3.from_json casts the validated configuration (sound
  since configuration values are now deep-validated as JSON).
- Tests: _build_v2/_build_v3 gained real Unpack[...Partial] signatures;
  raw-document pydantic inputs go through model_validate (the idiomatic
  entry point for untyped data) instead of ignoring constructor
  signatures; the frozen-dataclass test uses setattr for its
  intentional runtime error.

src and tests/model now carry zero type-ignore comments.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
roborev job 426 (branch review) found that ArrayMetadataModelV2
normalized an ABSENT dimension_separator key to '/', inherited verbatim
from the zng prototype. The v2 convention's default is '.': a consumer
deriving chunk keys from the model against a real-world v2 array
written with the default separator would have looked for '0/0' instead
of '0.0'. No test caught it because every fixture started from
create_default(), which always carries an explicit separator.

Absence is normalized to an explicit '.' -- a semantics-preserving
spelling normalization consistent with the model's existing canonical
forms (bare-string metadata fields, missing configuration). The field
is deliberately NOT modeled as Optional: the document grammar has no
null spelling for this key, and a None in the model invites writing
'dimension_separator': null into documents. Pinned by three tests,
including explicit-null rejection.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Establishes the models' None/absence invariant: None in a model always
corresponds to a JSON null in the document (a v2 compressor/filters
value, an unnamed dimension inside dimension_names), and UNSET always
means the key is absent. The two are never interchangeable.

Applied to the two fields that used None as an absence marker:
dimension_names (ArrayMetadataModelV3) and consolidated_metadata
(GroupMetadataModelV3). For dimension_names this also preserves a
semantic distinction d-v-b identified: an absent field ("there are no
dimension names") and an explicit all-null array ("every dimension has
a name, which is null") are different documents; both spellings now
round-trip faithfully and compare unequal.

Normalizing absence to the all-null form was considered and rejected:
the spellings' interpretations coincide but interpretation-equivalence
is the resolve layer's business, and collapsing document-level
distinctions on that basis is the layer violation this package exists
to avoid. Verified that current zarr-python never writes
"consolidated_metadata": null (GroupMetadata.to_dict pops the key), so
None there was purely an absence marker, not a document spelling.

UnsetType is a single-member enum (identity-checkable, repr "UNSET",
deliberately truthy so `if not x` cannot silently treat it as absent);
UNSET and UnsetType are exported from zarr_metadata.model and the
package front door.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…a null

Historical zarr-python versions wrote "consolidated_metadata": null into
group documents for groups without consolidated metadata, so real stores
contain the spelling; the validator was rejecting those documents
("expected a mapping"). Per the None/UNSET invariant, the field is now
honestly three-state: UNSET (key absent), None (the document's literal
null, preserved on round-trip), or a ConsolidatedMetadataModelV3.
Interpreting null as absence is the consumer's call, not a document
rewrite by this layer.

Also records an implementation constraint on the sentinel itself:
typing_extensions.Sentinel (PEP 661) is the intended spelling, but
pyright 1.1.411 degrades a Sentinel to Unknown in dataclass FIELD
annotations (function signatures work), verified by probe both with and
without enableExperimentalFeatures. Using it would reintroduce
suppressions at every use site under the strict gate, so UNSET stays a
single-member enum, with the Sentinel switch documented in
_sentinel.py for when pyright catches up.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
… preserve it

d-v-b: the bugged spelling should not be preserved or honored. The
three-state field reverts to two states (model | UNSET): a document
carrying "consolidated_metadata": null — written by a historical
zarr-python bug — remains readable (the validator accepts it so real
stores open), but the spelling gets no model representation: it is read
as absence and never written back. This is the one deliberate exception
to faithful round-tripping, pinned as such: from_json(null_doc) equals
from_json(absent_doc), and to_json omits the key.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…11115

Investigated: the Unknown-degradation of typing_extensions.Sentinel is a
confirmed upstream pyright regression, not by-design. Introduced in
1.1.405 (verified: 1.1.404 is clean on the same probe, 1.1.411 fails),
affects reads of any class-body attribute annotation (dataclass or
plain class), does not affect function signatures or module variables,
and Final on the sentinel does not help. Tracked as
microsoft/pyright#11115 (open, bug+regression); #11467 closed as its
duplicate. The enum sentinel stays until the fix lands.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
… pyright

Pinning a working pyright (<= 1.1.404) in CI was considered and does
not suffice: the pin controls one of four checker surfaces. Contributor
IDEs (Pylance bundles current pyright) and downstream consumers'
pyright read the py.typed inline annotations with their own versions,
and decisively, mypy 2.1.0 has no PEP 661 support at all — a sentinel
in type position is a hard [valid-type] error, which would degrade
these fields to Any for mypy consumers, including zarr-python itself.
The enum is currently the only spelling with exact types on every
surface; switch when pyright#11115 is fixed AND mypy implements PEP 661.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
Corrects the sentinel implementation note: PEP 661 was accepted
2026-04-23 and ships as stdlib sentinel in Python 3.15. The two checker
gaps blocking the Sentinel spelling (pyright regression #11115, mypy
not yet implementing the PEP) are therefore temporary gaps against a
Final standard, and the enum is a stopgap with a defined end state.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
…are the laggards

ty 0.0.56 types the Sentinel spelling perfectly in dataclass fields:
exact T | UNSET unions, both-direction is/is-not narrowing, and
wrong-typed constructor arguments rejected (verified with reveal_type,
so it is real inference, not silent Any). The checker matrix for
sentinel-in-type-position is therefore ty full / pyright regressed
(#11115) / mypy not implemented — recorded so the switch decision has
current calibration.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
d-v-b's call: PEP 661 is Final, ty already types the sentinel spelling
exactly, mypy support is in review (python/mypy#21647) and treated as
imminent, and pyright has a known-good version — so use the standard
sentinel today rather than carrying the enum stopgap.

- UNSET is now typing_extensions.Sentinel("UNSET"), used directly in
  type expressions (tuple[str | None, ...] | UNSET); the UnsetType
  companion enum is gone from the API.
- typing_extensions floor bumped to 4.14 (where Sentinel arrived).
- CI pins pyright==1.1.404, the last version before the class-attribute
  sentinel regression (microsoft/pyright#11115); pyproject documents the
  same pin for local runs. 0 errors on the pin; ty checks the sentinel
  fields clean (its 2 remaining diagnostics are its incomplete PEP 728
  extra_items write support, unrelated).
- Known short-term cost, accepted deliberately: mypy-checked consumers
  need cast/type-ignore at narrowing sites until mypy#21647 merges, and
  contributors' Pylance may show phantom Unknowns until the pyright fix
  ships. Recorded in _sentinel.py and the changelog.
- The pydantic native-introspection test reverts to documenting that
  introspection is unsupported (pydantic 2.13 cannot schema a Sentinel);
  the delegation patterns are unaffected.

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs release notes Automatically applied to PRs which haven't added release notes label Jul 5, 2026
d-v-b added 2 commits July 5, 2026 21:49
…ifact

Resolves the last flagged round-trip question from the initial port:
to_key_value on the v2 models always emitted a .zattrs key, so a store
that never had one gained a file on round-trip. Per d-v-b's ruling,
attributes on ArrayMetadataModelV2/GroupMetadataModelV2 is now
`dict[str, JSONValue] | UNSET`: UNSET means no .zattrs file (and no
attributes key in the merged document form) and emits nothing, while
any dict — including an explicit empty {} — means the file exists and
is emitted. The two spellings stay distinct through round-trips, per
the None/UNSET invariant; create_default defaults to UNSET (a fresh
minimal node has no .zattrs).

Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-fable-5


@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True, kw_only=True)
class ArrayMetadataModelV3:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

flagging this name as a bikeshedding target. The natural name would be ArrayMetadataV3, but that's already taken in this package by the typeddict type. Since array metadata is JSON, IMO this class cannot purport to "be" array metadata, but it can claim to model array metadata. hence this name. But i'm open to alternative suggestions!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for example: we could decide that the dataclass model of the metadata is ArrayMetadata, and the typeddict model is ArrayMetadataJSON, or ArrayMetadataMessage

@d-v-b d-v-b marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2026 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs release notes Automatically applied to PRs which haven't added release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant