WS-ARCH-001-HK1: reconcile post-02B engineering state

[Abiorh001]

Chunk

WS-ARCH-001-HK1 — Post-merge housekeeping

Goal

Reconcile durable engineering state after merged PRs #312, #314, and #315, and preserve one clear next implementation boundary.

Human-approved intent

Clean the repository and local worktree inventory before resuming feature work, without a broad rewrite or loss of unfinished work.

What changed

• Records AUTH-12I as merged through PR Activate unified guide compilation authorization #312.
• Records WS-ARCH-001-02A and 02B as merged through PRs WS-ARCH-001-02A: expose TASK submission context API #314 and WS-ARCH-001-02B: expose PROJECT locked-policy API #315.
• Makes WS-ARCH-001-02C the sole immediate architecture implementation boundary.
• Records POL-03B as eligible after AUTH-12I.
• Adds the unique HK1 housekeeping contract and documents conservative worktree cleanup rules.
• Clarifies that oversized production and test containers are repaired incrementally with the capability being touched.

Why and design

The durable records lagged merged Git history and could send contributors back to completed work. This change reconciles existing WS-ARCH-001, WS-AUTH-001/003, and WS-POL-003 ownership rather than creating a competing cleanup initiative. Local worktree cleanup uses three proofs: clean status, HEAD contained in origin/main, and no owning process.

Scope control

Documentation and local operations only. No production code, tests, schema, migrations, authorization catalogue, workflow, coverage threshold, or product behavior changed.

Acceptance criteria proof

All HK1 criteria are recorded complete in the chunk contract. The local inventory was reduced from 39 worktrees to 6; dirty, unmerged, and active worktrees were preserved.

Tests and checks

• python3 scripts/check_markdown_links.py
• targeted stale-wording scan across CURRENT_STATE, WS-ARCH-001, WS-AUTH-001, and WS-POL-003
• git diff --check

Test delta and CI integrity

No tests or CI files changed. No check, lane, timeout, or coverage threshold was weakened.

Reviewer results

• Architecture: pass with low risks; no boundary or scope violation.
• Docs: initial duplicate chunk-id finding fixed; re-review passed.
• Senior engineering: pass with low risks; cleanup rules are conservative.

External review

Pending GitHub Actions and CodeRabbit on this exact head.

Remaining risks and follow-up

Large legacy code and test files remain frozen structural debt. They are intentionally not bulk-split here. WS-ARCH-001-02C should repair only the CHECKER capability and tests it touches.

Human review focus

Confirm merged-state accuracy, unique HK1 identity, preservation of unfinished worktrees, and that 02C is the only immediate architecture boundary.

Human merge ownership

Human maintainers retain merge authority. This PR must not be merged by the agent without explicit approval.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@Abiorh001, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 7 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c62db4d9-6611-4b72-b1dc-3c4390faa68a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc84c41 and 2332b38.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)

• .agent-loop/CURRENT_STATE.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/CHUNK_MAP.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/DISCOVERY.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/STATUS.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/chunks/WS-ARCH-001-02A-task-submission-context-api.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/chunks/WS-ARCH-001-02B-project-locked-policy-api.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/chunks/WS-ARCH-001-HK1-post-merge-housekeeping.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/CHUNK_MAP.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/STATUS.md
• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-003-unified-project-guide-compilation/STATUS.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}