Repository navigation
Document that Northern Ireland business rates count regional and district rates - #2344
Conversation
The Northern Ireland statistic is LPS non-domestic rates paid, which covers the regional rate and each council's district rate (levied as one bill, Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977, art 9(1)). The OBR's "Northern Ireland business rates" line that projects it covers the regional rate only, which is why the statistic is about twice the line. ONS records the two parts separately (CRPSF FYE 2025: regional £327m, district £378m in 2024-25). Fixes #2343 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
941107b to
1432062
Compare
juaristi22
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed at 1432062732b89ea90c08c8a712fb010ecc523cdd against the actual merge base. No actionable findings from independent source and code reviews.
Primary sources support the regional-plus-district scope of the modeled NI business-rate level and the regional-only OBR comparator. The description correctly identifies applying that regional growth rate to the district portion as a modelling assumption.
A recursive parsed-YAML comparison confirms that only three documentation strings change; values, schedules, references and formulas are unchanged. Relevant source tables and arithmetic were independently checked. No behavioral tests or documentation build were needed for this documentation-only change.
…transfers Review r1 asked for the OBR line's coverage to be stated as a reading, not a fact, since the OBR does not define it. Add the NI Consolidated Fund's district rate transfers (£0.81bn of £1.59bn in 2024-25) as primary evidence of the district share, call the poundage split an estimate, note that LPS counts mixed properties as non-domestic, and label the 2026-27 partition figure as projected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Aggregate impact on certified data: passBase Checks: 0 broken by this change, 1 failing on both sides, 0 fixed. Moves flagged for review: 0 (thresholds in Notes
Moves flagged for reviewNone. Spending by benefit and service
Caseloads
Standard reform costings (change in gov_balance)
Standard reforms: change in each reform's target
Household net income by decileNo household's net income changes in any year. No change in any year: receipts by tax head; government balance, each component counted once; model totals; household income totals; population; poverty rates; people in poverty; inequality; mean household net income in each side's own deciles. Checks failing on both base and head (1)
Counted-once checkEach of 88 components was raised by £1 per unit in 2026-27, and every head of its totals was read household by household: its own head must rise by exactly £1, no other tax head may move, no other benefit may rise, and the model's own total must move by what its heads moved. A head that breaks a rule is measured again twice: with every other head held at its baseline value, and with every other head held at its value after the first £1 while the component rises again. It fails where either still shows the response. 0 failed; 0 were skipped.
Provenance
Dataset: Receipts by tax head: head levels
Spending by benefit and service: head levels
Caseloads: head levels
Government balance, each component counted once: head levels
Model totals: head levels
Household income totals: head levels
Population: head levels
Poverty rates: head levels
People in poverty: head levels
Inequality: head levels
Mean household net income in each side's own deciles: head levels
Standard reform costings (change in gov_balance): head levels
Standard reforms: change in each reform's target: head levels
|
Review r2: the Scottish workbook defines the contributable amount as "the nominal contribution to the non-domestic rates pool", so the header no longer says councils pay it into the pool. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Handed to the UK hub (session local_cc5241da-d81d-47c5-9a8a-400c640aa30d, which is archiving).
|
|
Merged by the UK hub (Claude session 8e19f9d5) at head
|
1 similar comment
|
Merged by the UK hub (Claude session 8e19f9d5) at head
|
Fixes #2343
Summary
Documentation only. No values or formulas change. It explains why
business_rates.statistics.revenue.NORTHERN_IRELAND(£741m in 2024-25) is about twice the OBR line that projects it (£382m):Evidence
District rates are about half of NI rates. In 2024-25 LPS paid £1,592.7m of "Regional and District Rates" into the NI Consolidated Fund. Of that, £814.4m (51.1%) went to councils as "Transfer of District Rates to Local Councils" (DoF, Public Income and Expenditure Account 2024-25, p17 and note 6 on p23; both property sectors).
Non-domestic, 2024-25, £m:
Why the OBR line reads as the regional rate:
ni_domestic_ratesinyoy_growth.yaml).Residual.
Decision
domestic_ratesalready charges the full NI domestic bill.Changes
parameters/gov/hmrc/business_rates/statistics.yaml: header (the NI bill; Scotland's series as a nominal pool contribution),NORTHERN_IRELANDcomment (district transfers, ONS rows, poundage estimate, growth assumption) and description (2015-16 to 2019-20 take the 2020-21 value, checked in the model).parameters/gov/economic_assumptions/yoy_growth.yaml: description ofobr.business_rates.northern_ireland.data/fiscal_partition.yaml: the NI sentence of thebusiness_ratesdata note. £0.78bn is the projected 2026-27 value.Tests
test_fiscal_partition.pyandtest_corporate_receipts_statistics.py: 182 passed locally (uv run --frozen --extra dev pytest, after mergingmain). No test reads the changed text.Review
~/reviews/ni-business-rates-reconciliation-2026-10-11/REPORT.md, with sources and scripts.axiom: n/a: documentation of official receipts statistics; no law encoded or changed
🤖 Generated with Claude Code