[Harshi-Shah-CS]

Ticket: CL-7174

What

• launch:functions:serve --port no longer has a short flag. In V2, -p means --password on launch:env:update and nothing else. A V1-style launch:functions:serve -p 4000 now stops with Nonexistent flag: -p and exit 2. The PORT environment variable still wins over --port, as in V1.

• launch:env:update no longer echoes a password typed on the command line. --password takes no value: the password comes from the hidden prompt or, without a terminal, from standard input. Typing one after it used to reach oclif, which printed it back:

  • -p <value>, --password <value> and --password=<value> printed Unexpected argument: <value>.
  • -p<value> printed Nonexistent flag: -<value>.

  That put the password in the terminal or CI log. LaunchCommand now refuses all four forms before parsing, with exit 2 and a fixed message that never repeats the value: --password takes no value. Enter the password at the hidden prompt, or pipe it on standard input.

• -p on its own, last, or before another flag still reads the password as before, so printf '%s' "$PASSWORD" | csdx launch:env:update … -u <user> -p is unchanged. The check only runs on commands that declare --password. Every other command leaves -p to oclif.

Tests

• src/core/password-argv.test.ts: the four refused forms, with a random value, and three accepted placements of -p/--password.
• src/core/launch-command.test.ts: a command without --password leaves -p <value> to the parser.
• test/integration/environments-update.test.ts: -p <random value> exits 2 with the fixed message, the value appears in neither stdout nor stderr, and no request is sent.
• test/integration/functions-serve-port.test.ts: -p 4000 is a nonexistent flag with exit 2. serve.test.ts asserts --port has no short flag.
• Full suite: 3,817 tests pass. Lint and tsc are clean. The Talisman and trufflehog scans against v2-dev are clean, and the .talismanrc checksums are in the commits that changed each file.
• Harness: the workspace scripts/launch-cli-manual-tests cases 75 and 90 cover both changes (separate workspace PR). Case 90 passes 15/15 against this branch.

Known edge, deliberately left: a value that oclif would reject anyway, such as --name -preview, now gets the --password message instead of oclif's "Flag --name expects a value". It's still exit 2.

#claude_code#
🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[snyk-io]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scan Engine	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Licenses	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Code Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[github-actions]

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type	Count (with fixes)	Without fixes	Threshold	Result
🔴 Critical Severity	0	0	10	✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity	6	9	25	✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity	5	7	500	✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity	0	0	1000	✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity	Breaches (with fixes)	Breaches (no fixes)	SLA Threshold (with/no fixes)	Status
🔴 Critical	0	0	15 / 30 days	✅ Passed
🟠 High	0	0	30 / 120 days	✅ Passed
🟡 Medium	0	0	90 / 365 days	✅ Passed
🔵 Low	0	0	180 / 365 days	✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

• Critical without fixes: 0
• High without fixes: 9
• Medium without fixes: 7
• Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed