[connortsui20]

Summary

• Tracking Issue: Epic: Row-oriented scalar functions #9128

Replaces the primitive comparison migration in #9979, using the shared executor from #10675. This PR depends on #10675, which is deferred until the independent foundations #10672, #10673, and #10674 merge.

Changes

The private row kernel selects the primitive type and comparison operator. The framework owns borrowed inputs, constant handling, strict validity, and packed Boolean output. Removes the primitive operand wrapper and handwritten primitive kernels while preserving the public Binary identity and Vortex's floating-point total ordering.

Native Graviton3 measurements showed regressions when this migration used only #10673. Removing only the fused-execution patch while keeping all three foundations also slowed the tested comparisons. The dependency on #10675 keeps that execution work available when this migration merges.

Existing comparison tests exercise the shared executor. The Vortex test suite was not run locally. Compiler investigation checks and focused native comparison measurements were run separately.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 6 benchmarks

4 warnings, 1 note

⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliable

Some benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ Unable to measure the execution of 1 benchmark

This benchmark measured no execution time, so its result is not comparable and counts as unchanged. This usually happens when the compiler removes the code under test.

Prevent compiler optimizations

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 19 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ Base and head ran on different runner types

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runner types, so the changes might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type, or use CodSpeed Macro Runners for more stable results.

Learn more about Macro Runners

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

ℹ️ 40 benchmarks have no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: the symbols of the profiling trace could not be resolved, because no information about the language frames was collected.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 15 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2387 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 12 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	CPU Simulation	random_i128[0.01]	4.4 µs	5.9 µs	-26.11%
❌	CPU Simulation	filter_powerlaw_by_mostly_false[250000]	136.9 µs	158.3 µs	-13.53%
❌	CPU Simulation	density_sweep_dense_runs[0.001]	53.8 µs	61.6 µs	-12.62%
❌	CPU Simulation	filter_random_by_mostly_false[250000]	162.4 µs	183.6 µs	-11.54%
❌	CPU Simulation	filter_powerlaw_by_power_law[250000]	165.7 µs	185.3 µs	-10.56%
❌	CPU Simulation	filter_random_by_power_law[250000]	165.5 µs	185 µs	-10.56%
⚡	Walltime	compare_f32_avx2	4.4 µs	2.5 µs	+75.17%
⚡	Walltime	compare_f32_avx512	3.4 µs	2.4 µs	+42.35%
⚡	Walltime	compare_u64_avx2	3.7 µs	2.8 µs	+29.85%
⚡	Walltime	compare_float_avx2	4.9 µs	3.8 µs	+28.96%
⚡	Walltime	compare_f32_neon	5.2 µs	4.3 µs	+21.88%
⚡	Walltime	filter_neon[8]	1.3 µs	1.1 µs	+16.98%
⚡	Walltime	threshold_neon[80]	4.6 µs	4 µs	+15.39%
⚡	Walltime	compare_int_eq_avx2	3.3 µs	2.8 µs	+14.78%
⚡	Walltime	compare_int_constant_avx2	2.7 µs	2.4 µs	+13.63%
⚡	Walltime	compare_int_avx2	3.2 µs	2.8 µs	+13.37%
⚡	CPU Simulation	test_repeated_scan_filter[int]	2.7 ms	2.4 ms	+13.34%
⚡	CPU Simulation	test_scan_filter_to_arrow_array[int]	2.8 ms	2.4 ms	+13.31%
⚡	Walltime	compare_int_constant_neon	3.8 µs	3.4 µs	+12.57%
⚡	Walltime	compare_int_nullable_avx2	3.6 µs	3.2 µs	+12.17%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing ct/row-fn-cleanup/primitive-compare (b837021) with ct/row-fn-cleanup/fused-execution (5cbf00a)}

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩